User Tools

Site Tools


slater_phillip_elliot

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
slater_phillip_elliot [2023/01/02 18:19]
jl
slater_phillip_elliot [2023/01/02 18:42] (current)
jl
Line 11: Line 11:
 I. The Greek Mother-Son Relationship: Origins I. The Greek Mother-Son Relationship: Origins
 and Consequences and Consequences
 +{{ :glory_of_hera_-_chapter_1_greek_mother_son.pdf |}}
  
 "This seems to me to explain adequately the presence of ac­ "This seems to me to explain adequately the presence of ac­
Line 30: Line 31:
 dramas of Greek, Elizabethan, and modern theater could have dramas of Greek, Elizabethan, and modern theater could have
 been written by homosexual playwrights." (10) been written by homosexual playwrights." (10)
 +
 +My first hypothesis—one which assumes
 +a much earlier change point than that suggested by Feldman
 +—was that the constellation derived its impetus from the gradual
 +evolution of patriarchy [cf. Levy, n.d., p. 257], or a sudden
 +transition from matriarchy to patriarchy. The tradition of a
 +patriarchal conquest of a matriarchal society is an ancient one
 +in classical scholarship—based on the evidence of early
 +matrilineal, matrilocal, goddess-worshiping traditions being
 +supplanted by their patriarchal counterparts [Murray, n.d., p.
 +56; Kitto, i960, pp. 18-23; Briffault, 1959, pp. 84-90]. In­
 +deed, some authors suggest an almost universal transition of
 +this kind for civilized societies, and there is much supporting
 +evidence [cf. Briffault, 1959; Campbell, 1959, pp. 315ff.; Neu­
 +mann, 1955]. This is difficult to evaluate, however, since so
 +much is based on mythology and tradition, and the ontoge­
 +netic experience of primeval matriarchy is universal, and may
 +provide the source of much of this tradition. For the Greeks,
 +at any rate, the evidence is real enough. Indeed, there seem
 +to have been several invasions at various periods by patriarchal
 +warriors, who, one can imagine, killed the indigenous males
 +and took the females to wife. Since in all cases the women
 +probably not only enjoyed a higher status in the older society,
 +but also partook of a more advanced and sophisticated culture,
 +one might expect to find here the ideal conditions for a brittle
 +patriarchy, an anxious and hostile relationship between the
 +sexes, and a transferring of libido by the wife from husband
 +to child. The repetition of this experience several times over
 +a millennium would gradually evolve the kind of cycle I have
 +described. (72)
  
 II. Symbols, the Serpent, and the Oral-Narcissistic II. Symbols, the Serpent, and the Oral-Narcissistic
Line 42: Line 73:
  
 V. Matricide: Orestes V. Matricide: Orestes
 +{{ :glory_of_hera-_chapter_5_matricide.pdf |}}
 +
 +Orestes' matricide is the most fully elaborated. It has often
 +been pointed out [cf., e.g., Bunker, 1944, p. 198; Friedman
 +and Gassel, 1951, p. 424] that while Oedipus is the concern
 +of only three surviving Greek tragedies, Orestes is in seven,
 +and is treated by all three of the great dramatists. It could in
 +fact be said that the Orestes myth was the most popular sub­
 +ject in Greek drama, and that the theme of matricide was
 +one with which the Greeks were peculiarly preoccupied.(162)
 +
 +The immediate issue of this war between the sexes is whether Clytemnestra's murder of Agamemnon or her own
 +death at the hands of Orestes was the more heinous crime.
 +A modern jury would have had difficulty in convicting
 +Clytemnestra,3 but the Greeks were terrified of the statu­
 +esque, passionate women they portrayed so effectively—
 +Medea, Clytemnestra, Hecuba, Alcmene—and this fear obliged
 +them to exaggerate and punish Clytemnestra's guilt. (164)
 +
 +Why, then, is Medea spared and Clytemnestra murdered
 +for her crimes? Clytemnestra kills only her husband and his
 +concubine, and cannot bring herself to do away with her
 +dangerous offspring; while Medea, with far less provocation,
 +slaughters her brother, her children, two kings, and a princess,
 +and attempts the life of Athens' most famous hero. Does the
 +murder of one's husband, then, outweigh all of these crimes?
 +The answer is, of course, that it did. The marital bond was
 +the weakest point in the Greek family, and the murderous
 +hatred of a wife for her husband was felt to be the greatest
 +potential danger and had therefore to be guarded against with
 +the most rigid care and punished with the most compulsive
 +severity.
 +Confirmation of this idea may be found in the horror with which Greeks regarded the myth of the women of Lemnos,
 +who murdered all their husbands and ruled the island by
 +themselves. To modern readers this is an amusing fancy—one
 +which, after all, ends happily with the pleasant sojourn of the
 +Argonauts and subsequent repopulation of the island [Apol-
 +lonius Rhodius: Argonautica i. 606-909]. Certainly it cannot
 +compare in luridness with the cannibalistic and incestuous
 +doings of Atreus and Thyestes, with the hideous deaths of
 +Pentheus and Heracles, with the crimes and sufferings of
 +Procne and Philomela, of Oedipus, Cronus, and a dozen
 +others. But how the Greeks themselves felt about it may be
 +judged from the following passage:
 +But the summit and crown of all crimes is that which
 +in Lemnos befell;
 +A woe and a mourning it is, a shame and a spitting
 +to tell;
 +And he that in after time doth speak of his deadliest
 +thought,
 +Doth say, It is like to the deed that of old time in
 +Lemnos was wrought
 +[Aeschylus: The Choephori 631-34.
 +Morshead trans.]4 (164-165)
 +
 +None of the modes of
 +response we are examining (with the possible exception of
 +Apollo's, with which it is closely allied) will be quite so
 +close to the classical Greek norm as this one; and there is no
 +character in Greek mythology who seems to epitomize the
 +fifth-century Athenian as fully as does the hero of Euripides'
 +Orestes. Whatever kind of run-of-the-mill swashbuckler he
 +may have been in earlier days, the dramatists molded Orestes
 +in their own image, and with his tribulations the Athenians
 +must have experienced an emotional empathy unmatched
 +even in so powerful a repertory.(192)
 +
  
 VI. Self-Emasculation: Hephaestus VI. Self-Emasculation: Hephaestus
slater_phillip_elliot.1672683578.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/01/02 18:19 by jl